S. E. Cupp is not an atheist. This is my best call, given the evidence. For those of you who do not know who S. E. Cupp is, she has just popped onto the media scene lately promoting her book which claims that the liberal media attacks religion. Her selling point is that she is from the "other side" and thus her argument is more genuine. Yes, that is right, she is posing as an atheist defending religion. This is a noble cause, but entirely misguided. I almost feel dirty for mentioning her on my blog because the want for comment is too strong. It is impossible to avoid falling into logical fallacies, but fuck it! I'm making no claims to irrefutability. Read what I have to say and make up your own mind on the matter.
Her premise, once more, is to provide an argument from the opposition to defend the sensibilities of religion. Were there an actual liberal media manhunt on religion, we might feel guilty, but there isn't one, so her claim makes too much noise in a quiet room. Just like we liberals cringe when the Israelis beat up the Palestinians, we would not be too comfortable with a media blitz against any religion. But S. E. Cupp's claim holds no water at all. As LiberalViewer on YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZkFqj5cX5U) points out, she's pulling her points out of thin air. This smacks of a hidden agenda. I also want to point out her perky demeanor on Bill Maher's show, which is reminiscent of Sarah Palin. Perky, but vapid.
S. E. Cupp makes no question about her "conservative" values, which is always a possibility for an atheist, but she is not sticking to the secular conservative arguments (small goverment, less taxes, more freedom of SPEECH). Instead, she sounds more like the neo-cons that are almost exclusively religious. In order to ingratiate herself with the natives, she has stated that she "aspires" to be a person of faith one day. This goes beyond "no true Scotsman." That ain't no atheist. When asked about what lead her to atheism, her answer was simply that she didn't feel like becoming a Christian. That doesn't preclude the belief in god, though, so we look deeper. She would later claim that she would one day like to be a believer. If S. E. Cupp is really an atheist, she is for the wrong reasons.
I've heard too many believers tell me that they were once an atheist like me, but they changed. I'm fairly certain that they were in no way like me. The story of many ex-atheists usually begins with them "rebelling" against the belief in God, like they resented having to believe. Eventually, they "wisened" up and fell back into line. This is not atheism, it is angst. Though the pedants will point out that atheism is only the lack of belief in a god and nothing more, there is an unwritten conversational definition of atheism that we all mean when we use the word. This definition encompasses a conscious certainty of the myth that is a supreme being. If you are really an atheist, there is no line to fall into. That is why an atheist claiming to aspire to belief is pure bullshit. That is why S. E. Cupp is a fraud.
12 nibbles: