08 April 2010

Taking It All In: The Evolution of an Atheist

I've been participating in a lot of discussions lately and it frequently occurs to me how difficult it is to impart my understanding of the world to people who read neither my blog nor my source material. How am I supposed to convince someone that there is no intrinsic purpose in life without first having them read mountains of literature? How can I get someone to see the world through my eyes? These realizations are years, even lifetimes, in the making, but that won't stop me from trying to be an agent in someone's enlightenment. If there is a discussion, there is a way. All I have to do is package my ideas into a simple, concise delivery. Like the shrinking of the microprocessor, that too may be a process that takes time, but here I am, starting it off.

With every year, every book, every epiphany, my understanding of the world grows more solid and confident. Some would call it a fool's wager to register an official philosophy, especially based on ideas I come across so early in life, but I'm pretty sure I'm not a fool. If I'm honest, there are things I know and things I don't know. For instance, I have no idea what my political personality is. If I were to go spouting off my opinions on liberalism like it was the solution for all mankind, I would feel like a lunatic on the inside. There is no end-all be-all philosophy when it comes to politics. Existence, however, is quite easy to know. Now, if you were to raise your voice and proclaim that far greater minds than mine have have been puzzled by a question I can supposedly answer so easily, I would say, "Exactly." Existence isn't for great minds to ponder, but they made a game of it anyways.

Epiphany: We can't all be right.

My first profound realization of the world came in my mid-teens when I was thinking about religion. I reasoned that if all religions claimed to be the one true religion, then either only one was right and the rest were wrong, or they all were wrong. Giving credence, for a moment, to the idea that only one was right, I pondered about which one that was. No option made more sense than the next. It was then clear to me that no religion, past or present, could rightfully claim to be the one true one.

Epiphany: Even the infallible is fallible.

After high school, I took a class on the history of Judaism at a local community college. This course followed a time line from the faith's roots to today, highlighting the persecution of the Jewish people throughout history, along with the offending doctrines. Counting every time either the Catholic church or the Jewish faith was revised and updated to fit the trends of modern times, I was left astounded at the notion that anyone could view any of either faith's teachings to be wise. Surely, if all that was needed was a popular revolt or a political allowance, the church would bend. The interpretation would be reinterpreted. The followers would continue to follow. Looking at religion from this perspective really helped me see it as not a personal thing, but a tool used by those in power to control a population.

I want to pause here and say that my epiphanies are the result of my personal observations, not some mathematical calculation based on cold logic. You may not see things the same way I do. You may not be paying attention to the same details I am. You may have a different explanation to digest the information with. A different person walking in my shoes may very well have turned into ... a different person. I'm not trying to convince you, just help you see how much has gone into the mentality that I now have. And obviously, I am leaving out a LOT of details.

Epiphany: Everyone's mileage will vary.

Throughout my late teens and early twenties, I had always been searching for "the formula;" some universal way to solve all of the problems of society, to teach people, to phrase a subject, to create an understanding. I put this idea into play when I created my discussion forum on the internet. For years, I participated in debates and discussions, honing what I greatly wished to be the one true way to communicate. If the internet is good at doing one thing, though, it is crushing your idealistic dreams. My experience taught me that everyone is extremely, irreconcilably different, taking nearly every variable of their life into account when they listen and when they speak. There was no way to normalize this. This was a slow and gradual realization for me, one which others acquired without even needing to think much about it, but it was important that I learned it that way. Throughout my "trials," I paid attention to people and I really got to be quite sympathetic.

Epiphany: We're not as evolved as we think.

I've always been preoccupied with psychology, which was why I was thrilled to discover the research of Dan Ariely a year ago. Ariely studies the irrational behaviors of people and his book, Predictably Irrational, compiles many clunky ways in which our brains tend to work. A few of his experiments reveal some frankly feral heuristics that remain in the brain from our evolutionary ancestors. In particular, the study of sexual boundaries before and during arousal caused my eyes to widen and my jaw to drop. While I would not expect any other person to extrapolate as much from reading this book, which was found in the business management section of the book store, I came away from it with a sense of inelegance. I began to realize that we're not so far removed from our cousins in the animal kingdom. Further, if one were to reject that we even evolved from animals and instead were fashioned in a god's image, I wondered how they would possibly explain away our mental faults.

Epiphany: Our existence is both improbable and inevitable.

I am still grateful to my friend, Arion, who gave me the book The Black Swan for my birthday last year. This book has changed my perspective of the world completely. One of the book's greatest lessons is putting the past into context. When we learn history in school or from a book, we are given a narrative of all the events that have been deemed important enough and witnessed enough to be worthy of a lesson. Everything is shaped to convey a time line or a moral. That isn't history, though. What we are missing is everything that didn't matter... because it actually does matter. For example, when we look into the history of the earth, we are only seeing what we have evidence for. But what of everything that came and went without leaving a scrap of evidence for us to discover? Did it not exist? Did it not have an impact on the things we DO have evidence for? We never take into account all the details we don't see, only the ones that we do. In this way, it is possible to see how our interpretations of the world can fail to attain their true cosmic meaning.

We can look at the world in one of two ways: We can see our existence as the improbable result of an infinite number of explosions, reactions, mutations and matings, or we can look at the sheer number of atoms, stars and planets in the universe (now 9 times larger than previously thought, by the way), multiply it by the billions of years since the big bang, and realize that, given as many chances, our existence is pretty much inevitable. There is no reason to think we're special. It is only our perspective, as a lone intelligent species in a vast uncaring universe, that we are lead to think that we are in the favor of a creator. A large part of my philosophy comes from reassigning my perspective to a very detached point of view.

Epiphany: The chaos theory explains more than you think.

You don't even have to have a question in mind, but the chaos theory will answer it anyways. The Black Swan briefly mentions the chaos theory, so I took it upon myself to do some research. It was about this time that I found a BBC special on YouTube called "The Secret Life of Chaos" (it has since been taken down) that explained it quite plainly. From there, and with a bit more research, I began to understand details about life that I had balked at trying to explain before. For example, if atoms react in predictable fashions, how can life emerge from non-life? This is a question many people pose, but they frequently fill in the blank with "god" because they aren't aware of other explanations. But the explanations are right in front of us. From the random patterns of stripes on a zebra, to the imperfect formations of clouds in the sky, we have a better, more rational way to explain the uniqueness and unpredictability of everything in our world.

Epiphany: Reality is not as subjective as you think.

As I read The Greatest Show On Earth, every little piece of evidence for evolution represented more than just a point on the scoreboard for Darwinists. Each point showed that there is a reality out there that nobody can avoid. No amount of believing will deny it. No amount of lunacy will alter it. There is reality and then there is your willingness to accept it. Knowing this is of great comfort, because the flip-side is a life filled with futile attempts to reconcile a fantasy with a cold, unfeeling universe. When you accept reality for what it is, you know what you're working with and you know how to really get what you want. It is empowering and freeing.

Epiphany: Nihilism.

This one is quite logical. If there is no creator, there is no motivation behind our existence. There is no reason for anything to exist beyond the cosmetic justifications we give. We are simply the byproduct of the chemical reactions of the universe. Knowing this, let's enjoy it while it lasts. For best results: make sure others enjoy it, too.

24 nibbles:

  1. We arrived at the final epiphany in vastly different ways but we're both there now :)
    ReplyDelete
  2. Scott: Care to share? I'm quite interested in everyone's story.
    ReplyDelete
  3. There's not much to share really, my path to atheism was fairly gradual I guess because I can't think of any specific epiphanies. I just wanted to let you know that despite my particular path I ended up coming to the same logical conclusion that you did: nihilism.
    ReplyDelete
  4. Out of curiosity do you often read books, essays, etc that challenge your beliefs? Such as christian apologetics, or (cringe) creation sciences "research". I'd first like to say that I thoroughly enjoyed your article and I that I am on a life path of discovery right now as well. My father a baptist pastor, I was raised in a strict conservo-christian home. Recently the "we can't all be right" idea landed home and I have since set out to find what I tell my dad is "the truth". Though I suspect this truth will have much more to do with science than his bearded man in the sky.
    ReplyDelete
  5. This is an excellent read. It is always entertaining to hear how others have arrived to their conclusions. To be honest, there are times when I find myself doubting what I believe, as sometimes good points are presented. However, once I have time to digest their comments/arguments/justifications, they just seem to border on lunacy. One of the key "talking points" that is used when defending one's religion is the circular argument of "without proof of non-existence, existence cannot be disproven." While it is a good point on the surface, one must simply attribute it to faith. I do my best to avoid trying any conversions, as atheism is not for the lazy or weak-minded (contrary to what many religious types believe) but more an open-mindedness to a world without a magic creator.
    ReplyDelete
  6. Anon: Do you mean books that "challenge" as in "cause me to really think" or "challenge" as in "blindly oppose for the sake of opposition?" I don't read full books that are partisan or circljerk pieces, but I certainly read articles and forum discussions that are. The reason for this is the time it takes. If I acknowledge a book as a formidable "foe" in ideology, then I am more inclined to read it. I wrote earlier this year about a book I had been given by a co-worker that challenged my political philosophy and it actually ended up changing mine a bit. If I felt a book had something to offer me, I would be inclined to read it.

    Booyaka: I used to think people had a good reason to disbelieve evolution, then I read The Greatest Show On Earth. Now I'm pretty sure that any doubt on their part is lack of information or conflict with beliefs. So it goes with almost everything else. We live in a time where we have damning evidence for many scientific concepts . Don't let anyone shake you off your points.
    ReplyDelete
  7. In my own story, the atheism was a state of being since birth, apart of any epiphany or consideration. I was raised in a religious household, and was forced to go the church every week, and to Sunday school, and youth group, and bible camp, and all of it simply seemed obviously contradictory and false.

    My father, a very logical and intelligent person, had faith in a creator. We agreed on the stuff of reality - science, the pointlessness of most organized religious services, the importance of philanthropy. But his arguments leading to those shared conclusions would come from the basis of "We have a creator, he has provided an opportunity for forgiveness through faith...NOW what are we going to do with our time here on earth?" whereas mine simply started with "What are we going to do with our time here on earth?"

    I never got the impression that his faith was a logical fallacy or a fault of rationality - it was an extra-logical state of his being, like his physical density. He woke up, and believed in something spiritual. He ate food and believed in something spiritual. He went to bed and believed in something spiritual. I never understood it, I think because it's not something understandable (from a spiritual/rational standpoint - perhaps eventually form a biochemical standpoint it will be). In any case, his faith didn't prevent him from discovering the natural world with open eyes, so I don't think it mattered one way or the other.

    As for Chaos Theory, the ability for there to be order from chaos is a Really Big Deal that people need to become more familiar with - I agree with this point completely! From a technical standpoint, understanding attractor and detractor points or self-regulation is very useful in understanding natural systems, but even a base realization that RNA can spontaneously form in the right solution due to the physical properties of the atoms/molecules in play can change a person's entire view of nature. Not only *can* the basic functions of life happen without obvious external triggering, it does, constantly, in and out of the lab.
    ReplyDelete
  8. This was a wonderful read. You articulated those epiphanies with humbleness and integrity, and I admire your respect for people despite their beliefs. I particular liked your views on human beings not being as evolved as many would think, I always wonder why creationists scoff at the idea of a common non-human primate ancestory when there is just so much similarity between us.
    ReplyDelete
  9. river-wind: Thanks for your input!

    Simple Cow: Thank you as well! I appreciate the compliment.

    To the crazy guy who keeps spamming his rants: I allow people to disagree with me on my blog, but I only allow civil debate. If you post your "atheists get out of my universe" crap, I'm only going to delete you. You add nothing to the discourse and thus nothing to my blog.
    ReplyDelete
  10. I am 20 and have gone through a very similar process.

    I love watching people, after they lose religion, using reason and reaching the conclusion of nihilism.

    If you are a label person, I started off catholic, went atheist, then nihilist, then nihilism existentialism, then nihilism existentialism/hedonist. Yayyy labeling beliefs.

    But nonetheless, it is a fascinating thought process.
    ReplyDelete
  11. Nihilism seems like such a negative concept. What are the alternatives?

    I love reading stories of deconversion--and yours is, like many of them are, different from mine, yet we reach similar conclusions.

    I Remember distinctly being 16 years old, driving to work with my father, when I realized that Zeus was the Greeks' way of explaining lightning. My greatest single epiphany was that gods were the manifestations of human ignorance. And then I met a creationist and realized just how deep that ignorance goes.

    The last six years of my life have been nothing but enlightened joy--the fascination of discovery--of our natural world--is stupendous and awesome.

    But nihilism? Seems so negative. I have to agree--there is no greater god nor purpose aside from the purpose we assign ourselves, but Nihilism always makes me think of The Big Lebowski. That's cool, man.
    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks for your post Konraden. I don't think nihilism is negative because, like the concept, it represents a blank slate. Just the same way hedonism is negative if you apply some arbitrary morality to oppose it, nihilism is only negative if you have this compulsion to insist that things come with purpose and meaning beyond what we assign it. When you let go of all that, you realize that things don't have a purpose beyond what we give it within our lives. There is no intrinsic reason for existence... and that's just a fact.
    ReplyDelete
  13. I think it is time to do away with the "a" word. It is negative and was invented by the mentally disadvantaged. I suggest "Open Minded" to call those who without blocking themselves into prefab, limiting mental structures are open to new ideas (spiritual and otherwise) enjoying the unfolding of a gigantic and fascinating universe with its forces and secrets presented to their developing understanding.
    ReplyDelete
  14. i for one was also raised in a christian/conservative home. i am now 57 years old, it took this long to clear my vision to the world around me. as an "open minded", after learning to get outsige the box so to speak, the world i see is different then the one i was raised. i now have fresh eyes free from the dogma and teachings of the self proclaimed righteous. it is refreshing to say the least. postings as this one are important to the conversation that now has come forward in our socieity. it took 2000 years to get to this point in deity worship, it may well take that long to pass beyond it..... so it has begun.
    ReplyDelete
  15. Thank you for this article, I have read way too many bumper stickers lately and was getting tired of the same old thing. I have been an atheist for forty years and for most of that time it was always better to keep my lack of belief quiet or keep looking for work. I was raised catholic by very religious parents, especially my mother. I went to catholic schools, was an altar boy, mom taught at the school I went to and our dinner guests were mostly priests and nuns. When I was around 12 or 13 I asked how the pope could be infallible. You would have thought I confessed to murder the way everyone freaked out. I heard all the blah, blah about gods plan, christian teachings and so forth, but no one even tried to really talk to me about it. It dawned on me that not once in my short life had anyone really discussed religion, we were told to believe and not question.I started to question everything, I attended every church, synagogue, gathering, revival and whatever else was going on at the time, I wanted to find a difference but I found the same thing. It didn't matter if it was called god,allah,budda,jesus,ra,zeus,or frank our god is better than your god and if you don't think like us, hell is your destination. I felt a sense of urgency that I couldn't quite explain until I happened to read something Hemmingway said;"all thinking men are atheists". It changed my life, I slowed down and paid attention to different sciences. Astronomy, physics, psychology and biology were there to explore. I discovered Darwin and others, the point being, once I started thinking and making up my own mind, I felt at peace with myself, I knew this was it and it was up to me to make the best of it. I have argued with theists for many years until I realized that it didn't matter to me whether anyone agreed with me or not. I don't try to convince others that I am right, it just saddens me to see the hate and prejudice that the religious spew forth in the name of their chosen god. I wish I had the talent to write like you and many of the folks who commented here, maybe I could share all that I experienced to make the decisions I made, but I obviously don't, so let me just say thank you.
    ReplyDelete
  16. I just wanted to thank everyone for adding their story here. I've read every word and I am happy to see how people come to the conclusion through so many different means. Keep it coming.
    ReplyDelete
  17. Do you realize that there is no logical reason to believe senses describe objects exiting beyond one's own mind? It appears more pragmatic to act as though other things exist in and of themselves, but there is no way to justify sensation as an arbiter of truth. Upon what, besides senses, can we rationally base our beliefs? Not intuition, for that is also unanchored, nor sensation, for that is tautology. In the end, one must assert, and upon these assertions build.

    What puzzles me is why you should feel certain about anything at all, besides that certainty is, itself, absurd.
    ReplyDelete
  18. Anon: When my senses detect the same thing your senses do, we share a reality. Reality is that which we can all observe. That, to me, is very logical. Doubting these obvious sensations is an exercise in a futile search for something beyond what we have. You can live your life like this if you want, but to me, it borders on mysticism. It is a flimsy extra layer of obfuscation added on to a concrete foundation for understanding our world.
    ReplyDelete
  19. "When my senses detect the same thing your senses do, we share a reality. Reality is that which we can all observe."

    Axiomatic. Truly logical. In the sense that it is tautological. In the sense that it is asserted. But from where comes logic? Intuition? Sensation? Somewhere else? Indeed, there are even several systems of logic, each independent, and each with contrary evaluation.

    I can only admit that it is useful to view sense data as more than mere sense data. I do not know why you think that this is "searching", some active measure to be taken, as it is only an observation -- a necessary one, if one is to sincerely pursue doubt and skepticism. Because of this realization, one may be flexible enough to change one's otherwise rigid mindset in the light of new evidence. Of course, this evidence is of the same character as prior evidence: it must be perceived, and such perceptions could easily be mistaken.

    It could hardly be called mysticism, to freely disclose that one's answers may be wrong, and to consciously avoid the thoughts that cause so many problems. Things change; one's concepts of things must change. And with that recognition, it is far more useful not to invest too much certainty into anything, because it will drag on like an anchor when the mind must move.
    ReplyDelete
  20. Anon: Here's how my brain works. I am an extrapolator. A pragmatist. I take a concept and I follow it through as many applications as I can imagine. Like a computer playing a chess game, I work out various scenarios before I settle on the ideas that seem most likely. The process is quite dynamic. I find my answers to the same questions changing often as I grow more experienced and knowledgeable. Ask me to answer a question again in a year and you'll get a different answer. I am no more attached to my conclusions than a spider to its web.

    That is, until the same conclusion keeps reappearing, despite the changes in the mental environment. That's when I feel I am on to something.

    So, don't you worry about my mind moving when it needs. I assure you that it is far too active for even my own liking.
    ReplyDelete
  21. I can't honestly say I'm a nihilist, because I've created my own reason for living. The spread of skeptical thought, and doing my best to be a catalyst to the spread of altruism.

    (too lazy to make a name or let the "Comment as" feature use my real name, so feel free to refer to me as Zain)
    ReplyDelete
  22. I normally don't post on random websites that I encounter (in fact, this is the first time I have), but I just wanted to tell you that I thought you hit the nail right on the head for me. I didn't really think the progression could be explained in such layman's terms, but as you mention with one important caveat: mileage will vary. Now to share a few of my own experiences based on your epiphanies.

    Epiphany: We can't all be right. I actually started looking into Eastern religions that believed in reincarnation as that was the only thing that made even a little sense to me (I knew the whole heaven and hell bit was a load of nonsense) because the universe is constantly reusing old material for new, so why not use old souls too?

    Even the infallible is fallible. Like you, I also come from a Jewish family. One of my first big questioning moments came to me during Passover when we are supposed to remember our time as slaves or some nonsense that can't even be proven; I remember wondering to myself "why do I want to remember something that seems so terrible?" Then the other usual nonsense came up like how did Noah fit all those animals on a boat, etc.

    Epiphany: Our existence is both improbable and inevitable. That sentence right there sums it up better than I've ever seen before, the word choice is impeccable. I hope you don't mind if I use it myself.

    Epiphany: Nihilism. This one really hit home to me. Once I realized there is no giant imaginary friend in the sky watching over me, I began to turn to different view points. I slowly drifted from existentialism to nihilism. Now I'm just trying to find something worth doing with my life, hopefully something that will make other lives better.

    Epiphany: Everyone's mileage will vary. I am now 18 years old, maybe a bit younger than your regular readers. I can't say without lying that I've been an atheist for a long time, only 3 or 4 years at most (although in retrospect this may be in proportion to your more seasoned readers). I am currently enrolled to be a freshman at Florida State University as I hope to major in Environmental Engineering (someone's gotta clean up after Bp, right?). It is in this manner that I hope to help people, by improving the planet we live on. I have also recently found out that my soon-to-be roommate is Christian (not surprising based on population percentages). I just hope to God that I don't offend him too much.
    ReplyDelete
  23. Thank you for the post. Nice to see reasoned approaches that are also well written. @bbridson
    ReplyDelete
  24. I'll try and keep this short. Just kidding.

    Like many, I too was raised "in church" with a very religious father, and a moderately religious mother. Baptist church. Choir. Sunday School. Youth group. All that. There was one thought which through most of that time I kept in the forefront of my thinking. "The Universe is an effect which requires an adequate cause, and the only adequate cause is God". I don't remember who to attribute the quote to, but it was sticky in my head, and I often referred to it during moments of doubt.

    As I grew into adolescence, I became vividly aware of something about me that was different, and frankly something that I had been taught all along was immoral, sinful, and a one way ticket to hell. Yep, if I had one epiphany, this was it. Oh God, I'm gay. Now what? This really wasn't a new awareness, as even in earlier childhood I could recall having an affinity toward other boys, and experiencing some confusion about it. It was simply a point in time where I became fully aware of my sexual orientation.

    This was 1982, by which time I was fully engaged in the church and in the faith. So my awareness quickly evolved into alarm. The next few years were sheer and utter torture. Maximum effort to pray away the gay as it were, periods of profound self-hatred, and hoping that nobody would somehow figure it out. Suicide was an option on the table at one point. I'm typing this today, so I made the correct choice then.

    Fast forward to 1990. I'm 22 years old, and my mother just died, after almost a decade of battling various pulminary afflictions, and importantly, a decade of fervent, sincere prayer for healing. Next epiphany - prayer doesn't work. Looking back through all of my experience with Christianity, not once has one of my prayers been answered, in any way. I'm sure this audience is well aware of the biblical assurances of the power and effectiveness of prayer, so I'll spare you the references.

    This is when I began to think about things critically. I questioned the "one true god"/"one true religion" dogma that had been pounded into my brain over the previous decade. I questioned WHY Christianity was the one. I didn't arrive at, nor receive an answer. I focused then squarely on two turning points in my thinking:

    1) Prayer doesn't work. Never has. Surely if being gay was such a reprehensible sin against God, God would answer my 8 year long continuous prayer to point me in the direction leading out of my "sin". Didn't happen. Surely the power of my love for my mother coupled with my passionate prayers for her would spare her life, and enable her to live in comfort. Not only did she die, she lived the last 10 years of her life suffering in unimaginable ways, and then she suffocated to death. Prayer didn't work there either.

    2) Absolutely nothing I had been taught by the church about homosexuality was compatible with my experience, or the experience of any of my gay friends. I was taught that it was a choice, and yet I never took that choice. I was taught that there could never be love in a homosexual relationship, yet my boyfriend at the time was a powerful indication to the contrary.

    I spent a few more years trying to hold onto the faith, but couldn't pull it off. Final epiphany: My entire childhood was hijacked by a mythical, mystical religion that didn't embody an ounce of truth. I was robbed of any opportunity to embrace my sexual orientation, and be at peace with it, maybe even be kinda stoked that I was different, and potentially able to experience a kind of human relationship that relatively few are able to experience.

    That's when I was done with religion, and with faith. That out of the way, it's easier to appreciate science, critical thought, and healthy doses of skepticism when I look at the world around me, and the universe beyond it, and just wonder.
    ReplyDelete